For twenty-three years, God’s words (the Qur’an)
were truly put into Muhammad’s mouth. Muhammad was not the “author” of
the Qur’an. The Qur’an was dictated to him by Angel Gabriel who asked Muhammad
to simply repeat the words of the Qur’an as he heard them. These words
were then committed to memory and to writing by those who hear them
during Muhammad’s life time and under his supervision.
Was it a coincidence that the Prophet “like unto Moses” from the
“brethren” of the Israelites (i.e. from the Ishmaelites) was also
described as one in whose mouth God will put his words and that he will
speak in the name of God (as in Deuteronomy 18:18-20)? Was it also a
coincidence the “Paraclete” that Jesus
foretold to come after him was described as one who “shall not speak of
himself, but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak…“(John
16:13)?
Was it another coincidence that Isaiah tied between the messenger
connected with Ke’dar and a new song (a scripture in a new language) to
be sang unto the Lord (Isaiah 42:10-11)? More explicitly, prophesies
Isaiah “for with stammering lips, and another tongue, will he speak to
this people” (Isaiah 28:11)? This latter verse correctly describes the
“stammering lips” of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) reflecting the
state of tension and concentration he went through at the time of
revelation. Another related point is that the Qur’an was revealed in
piece-meals over a span of twenty-three years. It is interesting to
compare this with Isaiah 28:10 which speaks of the same thing.
There the prophecy distinctly mentions that
the coming prophet who would be like Moses, must arise NOT from the
‘children of Israel’ or from ‘among themselves’, but from among their
brethren
That Prophet –Paraclete– Muhammad
Up to the time of Jesus, the Israelites were still waiting for that
prophet like unto Moses (peace be upon him) prophesied in Deuteronomy
18:18.When John the Baptist came, they asked him if he was Christ and he
said “No”. They asked him if he was Elias and he said “No”. Then, in
apparent reference to Deuteronomy 18:18, they asked him “Art thou that
Prophet” and he answered, “No”. (John 1:19-21)
In the Gospel according to John (Chapters 14, 15, 16), Jesus spoke of
the “Paraclete” or comforter who will come after him, who will be sent
by Father as another Paraclete, who will teach new things which the
contemporaries of Jesus could not bear. While the Paraclete is described
as the spirit of truth (whose meaning resemble Muhammad’s famous title Al-Amin,
the trustworthy), he is identified in one verse as the Holy Ghost (John
14:26). Such a designation is however inconsistent with the profile of
that Paraclete. In the words of the Dictionary of the Bible, (Ed. J.
Mackenzie) “These items, it must be admitted do not give an entirely
coherent picture.”
Indeed, history tells us that many early Christians understood the Paraclete to be a man and not a spirit.
It was the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) who was the
Paraclete, Comforter, helper and admonisher sent by God after Jesus. He
testified of Jesus, taught new things which could not be borne at Jesus’
time, he spoke what he heard (revelation) and he dwelled with the
believers. Such teachings will remain forever because he was the last
Messenger of God, the only universal Messenger to unite the whole of
humanity under God and on the path of preserved truth. He told of many
things to come which “came to pass” in the minutest detail meeting, the
criterion given by Moses to distinguish between the true prophet and the
false prophets (Deuteronomy 18:22). He did reprove the world of sin, of
righteousness and of judgment (John 16:8-11).
Was the Shift of Religious Leadership Prophesied?
Following the rejection of the last Israelite Prophet, Jesus, it was
about time that God’s promise to make Ishmael a great nation be
fulfilled (Genesis 21:13, 18).
In Matthew 21:19-21, Jesus spoke of the fruitless fig tree (a
Biblical symbol of prophetic heritage) to be cleared after being given a
last chance of three years (the duration of Jesus’ ministry) to give
fruit. In a later verse in the same chapter, Jesus said: “Therefore, say
I unto you, the Kingdom of God shall be taken away from you, and given
to nation bringing forth the fruit thereof.” (Matthew 21:43) That nation
was Ishmael’s descendants (the rejected stone in Matthew 21:42) which
was victorious against all super-powers of its time as prophesied by
Jesus: “And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken, but on
whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.” (Matthew 21:44)
Is it possible that the numerous prophecies cited here are all
individually and combined out of context misinterpretations? Is the
opposite true, that such infrequently studied verses fit together
consistently and clearly point to the advent of the man who changed the
course of human history, Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)? Is it
reasonable to conclude that all these prophecies, appearing in different
books of the Bible and spoken by various Prophets at different times
were all coincidence? If this is so here is another strange
“coincidence”!
One of the signs of the Prophet to come from Paran (Mecca) is that he
will come with “ten thousands of saints” (Deuteronomy 33:2 KJV). That
was the number of faithful who accompanied Prophet Muhammad (peace be
upon him) to Paran (Mecca) in his victorious, bloodless return to his
birthplace, to destroy the remaining symbols of idolatry in the Ka’bah.
Says God as quoted by Moses: “And
it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words
which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him.“ (Deuteronomy
18:19
May the light of truth shine in our heart and mind! May it lead us to
peace and certitude in this life and eternal bliss in hereafter!
Post a Comment