Needless to say, trinity is one of the most controversial creeds,
over which the three divine religions disagree. It is ironic that even
Christians themselves did, do and will continue to differ about such a
creed.
According to Judaism, the belief that Jesus is God, the son of God,
or a person of the Trinity, is incompatible with Jewish philosophical
tenets. The same applies to belief in Jesus as the Messiah or a prophet
of God: those beliefs are also contrary to traditional Jewish views. The
idea of the Jewish Messiah is different from the Christian Christ
because Jews believe Jesus did not fulfill Jewish Messianic prophecies
that establish the criteria for the coming of the Messiah. Authoritative
texts of Judaism reject Jesus as God, Divine Being, intermediary
between humans and God, Messiah or even saint. The belief in the Trinity
is also held to be incompatible with Judaism, as are a number of other
tenets of Christianity.1
In Judaism, the idea of God as a duality or trinity is heretical — it
is even considered polytheistic by some rabbis. According to Judaic
beliefs, the Torah rules out a trinitarian God in Deuteronomy (6:4):
“Hear Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is one.”
On the other hand, the Christian doctrine of the Trinity defines God
as three divine persons or hypostases: the Father, the Son (Jesus), and
the Holy Spirit; “one God in three persons”. The three persons are
distinct, yet are one “substance, essence or nature”.2
According to this central mystery of most Christian faiths, there is
only one God in three persons: while distinct from one another in their
relations of origin (as the Fourth Lateran Council declared, “it is the
Father who generates, the Son who is begotten, and the Holy Spirit who
proceeds”) and in their relations with one another, they are stated to
be one in all else, co-equal, co-eternal and consubstantial, and “each
is God, whole and entire”.3 Accordingly, the whole work of creation and
grace is seen as a single operation common to all three divine persons,
in which each shows forth what is proper to him in the Trinity, so that
all things are “from the Father”, “through the Son” and “in the Holy
Spirit”.4
In the synoptic Gospels, the baptism of Jesus is often interpreted as
a manifestation of all three persons of the Trinity: “And when Jesus
was baptized, he went up immediately from the water, and behold, the
heavens were opened and he saw the spirit of God descending like a dove,
and alighting on him; and lo, a voice from heaven, saying, ‘This is my
beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased.'” [Mt 3:16–17] Baptism is
generally conferred with the Trinitarian formula, “in the name of the
Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit” [Mt 28:19]
According to Islam, trinity is a false creed and Trinitarians are seen as polytheists and disbelievers. Allah says in the Qur’an:
O People of
the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah
except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a
messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul
[created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers.
And do not say, “Three”; desist – it is better for you. Indeed, Allah
is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs
whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient
is Allah as Disposer of affairs. Never would the Messiah disdain to be a
servant of Allah, nor would the angels near [to Him]. And whoever
disdains His worship and is arrogant – He will gather them to Himself
all together. (An-Nisaa’ 4:171-172)
Allah also says:
They have
certainly disbelieved who say, ‘Allah is the third of three.’ And there
is no god except one God. And if they do not desist from what they are
saying, there will surely afflict the disbelievers among them a painful
punishment. (Al-Ma’idah 5:73)
Historical Background
Scripture does not expressly contain a formulated doctrine of the
Trinity. The doctrine did not take its definitive shape until late in
the fourth century.5 During the intervening period, various tentative
solutions, some more and some less satisfactory were proposed.6
Trinitarianism contrasts with non-trinitarian positions which include
Binitarianism (one deity in two persons, or two deities), Unitarianism
(one deity in one person, analogous to Jewish interpretation of the
Shema and Muslim belief in Tawhid), Oneness Pentecostalism or Modalism
(one deity manifested in three separate aspects).
The first recorded use of this Greek word in Christian theology
(although not about the Divine Trinity) was by Theophilus of Antioch in
about 170. He wrote:7
In like manner also the three days which were before the luminaries, are
types of the Trinity [Τριάδος], of God, and His Word, and His wisdom.
And the fourth is the type of man, who needs light, that so there may be
God, the Word, wisdom, man.8
Tertullian, a Latin theologian who wrote in the early 3rd century, is
credited as being the first to use the Latin words “Trinity”,9 “person”
and “substance”10 to explain that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are
“one in essence—not one in Person”.11
The first of the early church fathers to be recorded using the word
“Trinity” was Theophilus of Antioch writing in the late 2nd century. He
defines the Trinity as God, His Word (Logos) and His Wisdom (Sophia)12
in the context of a discussion of the first three days of creation. The
first defense of the doctrine of the Trinity was in the early 3rd
century by the early church father Tertullian. He explicitly defined the
Trinity as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit and defended the Trinitarian
|
Trinity is a false creed and Trinitarians are seen as polytheists and disbelievers.
|
theology against the “Praxean” heresy.13
Although there is much debate as to whether the beliefs of the
Apostles were merely articulated and explained in the Trinitarian
Creeds,14 or were corrupted and replaced with new beliefs,145 all
scholars recognize that the Creeds themselves were created in reaction
to disagreements over the nature of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
These controversies, however, were great and many, and took some
centuries to be resolved.
In 325, the Council of Nicaea adopted the Nicene Creed which
described Christ as “God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God,
begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father”. The creed
used the term homoousios (of one substance) to define the relationship
between the Father and the Son. After more than fifty years of debate,
homoousios was recognized as the hallmark of orthodoxy, and was further
developed into the formula of “three persons, one being”.
Athanasius, who was present at the Council as one of the Bishop of
Alexandria’s assistants, stated that the bishops were forced to use this
terminology, which is not found in Scripture, because the biblical
phrases that they would have preferred to use were claimed by the Arians
to be capable of being interpreted in what the bishops considered to be
a heretical sense.16
The Confession of the Council of Nicaea said little about the Holy
Spirit.17 The doctrine of the divinity and personality of the Holy
Spirit was developed by Athanasius in the last decades of his life.18 He
defended and refined the Nicene formula.19 By the end of the 4th
century, under the leadership of Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa,
and Gregory of Nazianzus (the Cappadocian Fathers), the doctrine had
reached substantially its current form.20
Footnotes:
1 Rabbi Shraga Simmons, “Why Jews Don’t Believe in Jesus”. Retrieved
2006-03-14., “Why Jews Don’t Believe in Jesus”, Ohr Samayach – Ask the
Rabbi, accessed March 14, 2006; “Why don’t Jews believe that Jesus was
the messiah?”, AskMoses.com, accessed March 14, 2006.
2 Definition of the Fourth Lateran Council quoted in Catechism of the Catholic Church, 253
3 Coppens, Charles, S.J. (1903). A Systematic Study of the Catholic Religion. St. Louis: B. HERDER.
4 “Catechism of the Catholic Church, 253-267: The dogma of the Holy Trinity”.
5 McGrath, Alister E. Christian Theology: An Introduction Blackwell, Oxford (2001) p.324
6 Kelly, J.N.D. Early Christian Doctrines A & G Black (1965) p. 88
7 Theophilus of Antioch, To Autolycus, II.XV (retrieved on 19 December 2006).
8 W.Fulton in the “Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics”
9 Aboud, Ibrahim (Fall 2005). Theandros an online Journal of Orthodox Christian Theology and Philosophy. 3, number 1.
10 “Against Praxeas, chapter 3”. Ccel.org. 1 June 2005. Retrieved 2 January 2012.
11 Against Praxeas, chapter 2 and in other chapters
12 History of the Doctrine of the Trinity. Accessed 15 September 2007.
13 Theophilus, Apologia ad Autolycum, Book II, Chapter 15
14 Tertullian Against Praxeas
15 Bingham, Jeffrey, “HT200 Class Notes”, Dallas Theological Seminary, (2004).
16 The Encyclopedia Americana (1956), Vol. XXVII, p. 294L
17 Nouveau Dictionnaire Universel (Paris, 1865–1870), Vol. 2, p. 1467.
18 “Athanasius: De Decretis or Defence of the Nicene Definition,
Introduction, 19”. Tertullian.org. 6 August 2004. Retrieved 2 January
2012.
19 “Trinity”. Britannica Encyclopaedia of World Religions. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica. 2006.
20 On Athanasius, Oxford Classical Dictionary, Edited by Simon
Hornblower and Antony Spawforth. Third edition. Oxford; New York: Oxford
University Press, 1996.
21 “Trinity”. Britannica Encyclopaedia of World Religions. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica. 2006.
22 “Trinity”. Britannica Encyclopaedia of World Religions. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica. 2006.
Post a Comment